Bid consultancies publish testimonials. We publish outcomes.
Every recommendation we make for a client is recorded the moment we make it, before anyone knows how the tender turns out: what we advised, the competitive range we quoted, the client's own profitable floor, and the reasoning. That record cannot be edited afterwards.
Months later, when the buyer publishes the award notice, each decision closes itself against that public record. Did the tender we advised a client to decline award below their floor, as we said it would? Did the bid we supported win? The answer is a matter of public data, not our word.
What will be published here: how many decisions we have recorded, how many declines the award data has since verified as below the client's floor, how many of those declines the data proved wrong, and the win rate on bids pursued through Haldwyns. The misses are published beside the hits. A record that only shows its wins is a testimonial with extra steps.
When: once enough decisions have closed for the numbers to mean something. Publishing a track record built on a handful of outcomes would be its own kind of dishonesty, so the numbers stay private until the sample earns its place.
UK award publication is imperfect and often slow. Decisions whose outcomes have not been published stay open and are never guessed.